Students are introduced to the practice of "Ekphrasis" to practice "reading" an image/photograph.
_jp2.zip%2FThe%20Complete%20Maus%20(2003)_jp2%2FThe%20Complete%20Maus%20(2003)_0208.jp2/63,125,1184,726/1200,/0/default.jpg)
In "The Generation of Postmemory" Marianne Hirsch introduces a key concept for understanding historical records of political violence:
"Postmemory describes the relationship that the generation after those who witnessed cultural or collective trauma bears to the experiences of those who came before, experiences that they “remember” only by means of the stories, images, and behaviors among which they grew up. But these experiences were transmitted to them so deeply and actively as to seem to constitute memories in their own right. Postmemory’s connection to the past is thus not actually mediated by recall but by imaginative investment, projection, and creation. To grow up with such overwhelming inherited memories, to be dominated by narratives that preceded one’s birth or one’s consciousness, is to risk having one’s own stories and experiences displaced, even evacuated, by those of a previous generation. It is to be shaped, however indirectly, by traumatic events that still defy narrative reconstruction and exceed comprehension. These events happened in the past, but their effects continue into the present. This is, I believe, the experience of postmemory and the process of its generation."
Curiously, in addressing Art Spiegelman's Maus, a comic book account of the Holocaust as narrated by the artist's father, a survivor, Hirsch focuses first on photography, and not drawing (or graphic speech) as a medium of remembrance: "For me, it was the three photographs intercalated in Art Spiegelman’s Maus that first elicited the need for a term that would describe the particular form of belated or inherited memory that I found in Spiegelman’s work."
For this hands-on lab activity, we will conceive of Spiegelman's Maus as an archive of visualized memories Spiegelman methodically collected and curated from his father Vladek, based upon Vladek's oral testimony. Additionally, following Hirsch, we will view Maus as a body of evidence about Art Spiegelman's own state of mind as a survivor of second-hand trauma. The focus of our study, however, will be upon his handiwork.
Like fingerprints at a crime scene, hand-drawn lines and words are uniquely expressive of their creator. Visualized scenery inside a frame reflects the perspective of the artist as much as the witness. What isn't shown is left to the reading viewer to fill in. Using concepts introduced by Scott McCloud, such as line-drawn cartoon, the connecting gutter between panels, and a simple cropping tool (embedded below) we will select, describe and interpret examples from Maus. This exercise in a discussion-based setting will help prepare you collaboratively for your solo illustrated paper assignment that follows.
NOTE: You are welcome to use materials and ideas you submitted for this lab activity in Paper Assignment #3!
The passage below is quoted from scholar and Spiegelman collaborator Hillary Chute in "Maus's Archival Images and the Postwar Comics Field," a chapter from her Disaster Drawn: Visual Witness, Comics, and Documentary Form (2016). Remember that Chute is an advanced scholar, and has considerable experience writing such passages.
You can inspect The Complete Maus in the viewer below, thanks to IIIF (The International Image Interoperability Framework), a standard used by the Internet Archive and other libraries and museums (including the UCLA Library Digital Collections). Click into any page thumbnail, advance pages, and return to thumbnail view by clicking the display options icon in the upper right corner.
You are encouraged to keep it simple and write what you see in your own words; in your observation and interpretation of details, you do not have to be "right."
Post by January 22, 11:59 pm
Once you have posted your own submissions, take some time to read and look at posts by others. Choose at least one (preferably one that has not already received comment), and reply to it. In your brief (approx. 20-30 words) follow-up post, engage with the shared image directly, as well as the description, observations, and interpretations of details:
Reply by the start of your section's Week 3 meeting time